RAMA IN IDENTITY
CONVENTION/ What happened behind the scenes of the opposition’s two-day meeting
OPENING OF THE PS CAMPAIGN
SPEAKS FOR 1 HOUR AND 45 MINUTES,
DOES NOT MENTION SALI BERISHA
“RENAISSANCE” TIE, GESTURES AS 8
YEARS AGO AND COLOR BEHIND HIM
DELIVERS SPEECH WITHOUT A PAPER. REACTION
PD: IT WAS A PARODY, WE WILL DISMISS IT
The news
Edi Rama has returned differently to the stage of the Congress Palace. With a tie in the color of Rilindja, with a speech made on the spot, without a prompter in front of him, only a few notes on paper; raising his voice when speaking about the people’s problems and with jokes like “I don’t have a problem with nudity”, in a speech that lasted a full 1 hour and 45 minutes, leaving behind the PS leader, he has returned to what he once was, in Identity. What happened behind the scenes at the PS convention and how the socialists will carry out a different kind of governance.
TIRANA
JAKIN MARENA
Edi Rama, chairman of the PS and the opposition, on the second day of the convention while delivering the closing speech, reminded all Albanians of the rebel, the controversial and the outspoken one, and more...
continues on pages 2-5
Show must go on, in practice
Editorial
BY ANILA BASHA
Show must
go on,
in practice
Henri Çili, publisher of the newspaper Mapo, tried in his comment yesterday to analyze the convention of the pink headquarters, the way it was carried out, from the media point of view, the populist one, but also its programmatic substance.
Undoubtedly, this kind of organization by the socialists, shaped with graphics, tables, photos, the finding of the government’s most failed elements, sarcasm and irony about governance, will attract the attention of analysts.
What first stands out is the organization: the lack of flags, placards, firecrackers inside the hall. The simple, clear way of showing that there is no great need for pomp, for buses to fill the hall, but for delegates who need to hear a new program that is being launched. From a visual point of view, there are critics who say there is no enthusiasm. The question arises: does the citizen want to see the unprovoked ‘excitement’ of crowds shouting, or the program displayed everywhere, to see how a political force will act differently tomorrow in power (if it wins the election)?
And then there is the mimicry for every word and moderator. The main stage of the Congress Palace was not the “domain” of two or three figures, present all the time in every kind of discussion at the table...
continues on page 6
