Parliament, usury under investigation
Blerim Çela: "If people lose, that has nothing to do with the state"
In our country there were also unexplained events, openings, daredevils, there is no way to think that the Party anahisë the whole depositors just as the Commission, and the representatives demanded their return. In the Economy Commission they called for the mission to be drafted, and a group of opposition MPs accused the government of protecting the investments of the mysterious firm, clearly to devalue or hide documents. These things became clear, turning the deposit into a defense prov-ersion. Socialist Party MPs and Arben Malaj know them as coordinators. Jash- nëm that they are known in law to be regulated by the part-ition of the depositors by the Commission.
Since the commission will not have a strictly investigative character, but also an administrative one, the deputies and experts discussed the government and the decisions. In order to include the language of control and responsibilities, apparently both for the effects and for another name. This will most likely be called a "special commission for the assessment of reform". Titles that make it possible to avoid the word "usury". Apparently, on the other hand, they were told under obligation not to use the term in parliament, since this term has foreign consequences, candy-like, appearing with "usury"; give it that name to take "the control commission".
Since the commission will not be strictly investigative in character, but more administrative in aspect, the experience of drafting should be used, which does not hide the loss with the name now used. The state hides the loss behind the commission's word "usury". The state hides the loss behind the commission's word "usury". In this article, the government transformation in relation to the firms was clearly discussed. According to the proposers and future ministers from the former government, there should be special, not investigative, oversight. This will be the task of the commission, which may end in discoveries for citizens and businesses.
Blerim Çela has been one of the most highly regarded experts on this issue, and in the interview he explained that if people lose, that has nothing to do with the state. He said that the state cannot be held responsible for citizens' private deposits in non-bank firms.
Photo REUTER