Crime, 80% of the police under accusation
Arbnori withdraws, failure without winning. Berisha: This is a government of losers. The monarchy, the post-constitutional one, remains in the shadows and Shansburg[?]
Italy: First the money, then the refugees
Reunification, now too late
"The movement for reform." It seems that the first sacrifices of the PD reformists will determine whether this is the start of reform or the continuation of the same after failure. Will we have a PD, crossing into the first stage? The PD is influencing some of the groups that have split from the PD and are seeking to create a new structure.
We are starting from the theses of the debate of the PD reformists, and quite a bit of how the reform process went is a high stick. The most failed candidate of the PD! Indeed, considering that he has won all the battles and that his removal from the post of chairman is becoming almost a tradition, a decision sure to come from the respected opening of its extraordinary congress. In this regard, to the aims of the groups more than he[?], he raises it with a phrase, party! an indisputable part. I do not know for what position? it is! despite the fact that he[?] and did not enter the reform process, but it was not done he[?] proper that he had theirs in punishing Berisha, with closer he[?] without believing, on the contrary. He remained the only one and in the political spotlight. “The party belongs to the chairman” and “of the [??] yesterday with the title ‘Failures of the government’ help is being disrupted with the lower title ‘Movement for reform’ are the messages given. In this idea, over time and the others. “Movement for democratization”; now separated from the PD, Mr. Bashkim Shehi. On a day with a meeting of the “relatives linked to justice and the relatives called with the harvest this is p[?]tuy to be possible. Perhaps let us think that the PD is with a k[?] for the relatives linked to the government. An idea with disturbances?” The latest intervention by the extraordinary speaker of parliament said that the party of reforms puts? a government of those who ask? In words, the only one that? map, seems to be the first. The suspicions that in this? of parties there is always. But it is not true. If the withdrawal from the post of “the failed one” was to value the opposition? and? strong ones by leaving? burden. The “democratic majority” happened with the co-government of the socialist center. It is more! their grouping that PD with. And one? grouping? in the withdrawal? of? the reformists? “Ive, we do not have a PD with! shaping the first? with? system? “Regardless? found front? and? between? and no? and? K? such? true? what? ment? r? and? “No? true? PDSH? from behind? UN. This second aspect passes. Des? gives? p? opposition? It is not [??] reth? question? Scenario? “the voters”; “the voice is with? of the chairman”. Still remains? and us? ? the government to be worth, [Arbnori on page 2]