Judge" Brozi in the service of old politics
-During the debates in parliament, Brozi has stated with complete conviction that Nano is guilty
-Brozi has protested to the Inter-Parliamentary Union over interference in the internal affairs of Albanian justice
-Nano case in Cassation - Brozi does not take part in the bench because he had previously declared Nano guilty
The 9th of December will be remembered by the Albanian people in the fighting territories as the arrival of the Italians, just as it is for the Albanian "Blavatat", where is the comparison? This is a known political and opposition development of ours in Greece. Each one likewise morally. From where did the matter and everything arise. Thus Mr. Kacani has explained the argument very well before Parliament. Mr. Chairman! Since the construction of the new parliament would have...? and the legality of the elections of 26 May, which has been quite contested in various European circles. This inability to verify the elections, PS, is already safe? The elections have been concluded successfully and the PS, as an opposition party, has chosen its alarm for doors and windows. This now constitutes proof. Mr. Chairman, because of the constitutional developments and the sessions of 1991, I consider your statement that “all those decisions are excluded” to be a precedent. On 8 June 1991 the public announcement of the preliminary conclusions reached its peak. These statements were made against the doors and the language of institutions. In our country there have always been normal developments, but through radical phrases. On the other hand, we cannot accept. Brozi has always been at the center of these political positions. On 8 June 1991 he declared before the loudspeakers of the crowd: “We will only do politics; let no one threaten us with prison, internment and executions, because we will respond in a radical way, destroying ourselves at all costs.” Here he expressly proposes the building of an unconstitutional opposition. In a wholly unacceptable manner he has also taken a position on the application of the laws in force. These are positions that make his participation in the trial of the Nano case incompatible.
Brozi’s game is old
Where does the suspicion arise? There is such a tone, and Mr. Kacani has done very well for the purpose of the purpose. Since in the Albanian parliament before the assembly and his statements now clearly explain his position. Brozi has been one of the most active voices on the side of the old opposition. This also includes concrete political organizing activity. After the failure of the talks for the governing coalition in July 1992, Brozi aligned himself without hesitation with the bloc of opponents of the majority. Subsequently he opposed the country’s constitutional and legal reform. While the Nano case was being handled by justice, Mr. Brozi not only publicly came out in his defense, but zealously proclaimed that the conviction was political. This prejudices his position as a judge. In 1993, after the arrest warrant for Mr. Fatos Nano, Brozi addressed the Inter-Parliamentary Union with a protest denouncing “interference” in the affairs of Albanian justice. This text was presented as an act of political solidarity, not as a legal assessment. This fact alone is enough to show that he treated the case on a political level and not a judicial one.
At the moment when the Nano case goes to Cassation, Mr. Brozi cannot be part of the bench. According to all norms of independence and impartiality, a judge who has previously spoken so clearly about the guilt or innocence of a defendant must be excluded. This is in the interest of justice and public trust. Therefore, Brozi’s participation would constitute a serious violation of the process. The issue has nothing to do with his personal name, but with the standard of the rule of law.