A SMOKESCREEN, ALMOST WITHOUT HOPE
The parliamentary commission, in its report on the events in Shkodër, called before the deputies for the dismissal of the head of the General Investigative Directorate, Qemal Lame, the Prosecutor General, Rapi Mino, and the Minister of Internal Affairs, Gramoz Ruçi, as well as other measures against lower-ranking specialists who bear responsibility for those tragic events, both for their inability to prevent them and for the delay in bringing the truth to light.
Yet this report offered nothing else new, because the investigation has encountered difficulty after difficulty, driving it into the Greek calends. But what did the gentlemen deputies say about this report, and does it speak for its own people, speaking in the name of honesty and truth? Mr. Dritëro Agolli acted likewise. After he finished speaking, we heard applause. A rare occurrence. But why? Because, with civic courage, as a creator and a person of vision, he said that no one is permitted to use murderous violence. This is the warning of this assembly. In Albania, there have been no mass killings of crowds as in China and Romania. But there have been more than a few isolated killings. These are evil and clandestine, base and cunning, for they are shrouded in obscurity and give the killer the opportunity to hide. This method reached its peak in Shkodër. Because of this, all public opinion rose to its feet; it speaks in the name of truth, for the truth. And feet ... Albanian and worldwide, but false official statements only deepened the fog. The investigations have produced no conclusions. Apparently, the investigators did not consider these events important, because an opposition member was killed and that was all. He calls on the political parties to work harder to establish calm. He says that the martyrs’ blood demands honor, and also describes our parliament, which should have observed a minute of silence, because the blood of those who fell recognizes no nomenklatura. The proposed measures are appropriate. If four activists of the Labour Party had been killed, would those proposed for dismissal not have been dismissed? Certainly, they would not only have been dismissed. But, rather than speculate, let us shed some light on the event through the account of a deputy who was present. This is the doctor Ali Spahia. He had reason to help disperse the assembled crowd. He was together with Arben Broci. Both had been sent in by the law-enforcement forces. They tried to get the law-enforcement forces, who had pursued the students, to leave and get into their vehicles. As he was helping ... the students. While he was helping a wounded person there, Arben went 30 or more metres ahead, towards the square by the PPSH committee. At that moment, a volley of shots rang out. Two minutes later, Arben was killed. There were no forces or people in the square. Who fired? Why should there have been snipers on buildings overlooking Shkodër? When law-enforcement personnel were there, when the PPSH committee officials were bloodied, when the situation was calm, how can it be that no one knows who fired or whose orders they were following? Why was the film recorded by the specialist from the district branch of internal affairs supposed to be archived in the safe of the PP committee, when the situation was calm and vandalism against the central institutions of the PP in the district began only more than an hour and a half later? What was the camera doing in that committee, just as what was the Zagreb radio reporter asking for at that moment, to film and broadca-
There was polarization. The deputies of the “Party of Labour” expressed regret and called for the murderers and those who ordered them to be punished, but few pointed clearly to the delays in the investigation, to the first false official information, to... There were also some who disagreed with the release of the Minister of Internal Affairs. The gentlemen of the Democratic Party, as a bloc, made their powerful voices ring out, calling for the guilty to be held accountable, for Shkodër to regain its calm, for the truth to be seen—or they cast it as plain as day. Of course, there were also a few who went too far; yet the blame for this event, the grief of an entire people, is always deeper and greater than any uncontrolled expression, and the slab? is nowhere to be seen.
But I would like to dwell on the accounts of two deputies concerning the PPSH, who rose above narrow party interests in the name of truth. The first is Mr. Shaqir Vukaj, deputy for Shkodër. His speech is an honest effort. Why was the investigation team late in going to Shkodër? Why was the chronology of events incorrectly given in the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ information? Why is there unemployment in Shkodër, and why are raw materials lacking? He directly blames the leading members of the Party of Labour in the district, who should have gone out to speak to the demonstrators, especially since they were mostly school students. Had this been done, more than one tragedy would have been avoided. The government, too, should have gone there as soon as possible, to the people, so they could see that the government was concerned. To put it briefly, if one looks at the matter, we are dealing with unemployment: there are 30–40 thousand unemployed in Shkodër, a very large city with a poor standard of living. Calls were made there for cooperation among political forces and religious communists... Shkodër does not ask its brother to ... [partly illegible] The deputy is deeply concerned and ...
... to prevent them, and also to bring the truth to light. But there was nothing else new in this information, because the investigation has encountered difficulty after difficulty, which is pushing it into the Greek calendar. But what did the gentlemen deputies say about this information and the tragic event?
Of course, they would not only be dismissed. But, rather than speculate, let us recount the event briefly in the words of a deputy who was present. This was were brought in by the forces maintaining public order. They tried to prevent the police forces who had pursued the school students from leaving and getting he was helping an injured person there, Arbeni went 30 or more metres ahead, towards the PPSH committee square. At that moment the volley began. Two minutes later Arbeni dominant buildings in Shkodër? When the bloodied, when the situation was calm, how is it that no one knows who fired and who gave the order? Why was the film made to be archived in the PPSH committee’s safe, when the situation was calm and the vandalism against the central institutions of the PPSH committee, just as what was the Zagreb radio correspondent asking for at that moment, to film and to trans-
The respected Naim Karriqi connects the events in Shkodër with those in Kavajë and concludes that the actions there, too, were directed by the PPSH committee. Mr. Thoma Miço of «Omonia» asks why the investigations began late. Who fired, and who has weapons? We see armed people everywhere who are not members of the public-order forces. Fair criteria must be established for who should be allowed to carry weapons. This concern comes from the minority area. Acts of violence have taken place there, too. They are tragic. It is a true tragedy. A few members of the minority have left their bones at that border, hoping to see brother meet brother on the other side.
And they demand an end to violence and killings. Those who committed the crime in Shkodër must come forward. This is not a matter of finding two or three scapegoats. No, absolutely not: those in power who gave the orders must be found as well. Democracy cannot flourish through killings. Why should a person or group of people who break the rules (and they are not right to do so) and go out to demonstrate peacefully, or even chant slogans, be gunned down? That offence certainly carries a specific penalty, and nowhere in the world—not even under our law (since, formally, we are very democratic)—is taking a life prescribed as punishment. The events in Shkodër were obscured, but Artan Lenja was killed in Tirana in front of his home—what happened to the murderers? Why are they being protected, and whom does that serve? The people—no; nor does the Party of Labour, because any party, in any country in the world, loses its reputation and its supporters if it remains silent in the face of criminals. The four party ... crushed in Shkodër after 2 April are the best argument for this. Why must the murderers be found, and as soon as possible? This is the appeal of the whole people. This is what the deputies are asking for, too.
PETRO DHIMITRI
... there are killings and the camera is burned?! Not only that, but, as the Chairman of the Investigation Department Qemal Lame said, the MPB authorities did not carry out the transfer. Nor did they block and inspect the weapons. Thus, they did nothing, because they knowingly violated the law. Why? Because the perpetrators were their own forces. Had it not been so, every action would have been carried out with the greatest speed, as in other cases.
The Albanian home will be built by bringing down the “Berlin Wall” between Albanian brothers. Let us make our home a place where we are united and equal. As a nation, we have taken part in Europe’s glorious history. This should make us cast off every inferiority complex once and for all.