By Natasha LAKO From the recent debates on the way the Constitution is being written, we know the opinion of an individual, an official, the chosen one. With the teachers, assurance for the teachers. With the intellectuals, the argument for the intellectuals. To replace power not with spirits, but with professionals. Not with artists. But they have forgotten that a man, noble in culture, cannot be humorous. Arrogance flourishes, while ignorance, used for the purposes of persuasion, is one of the daily themes of accusations. The categories that change in this absurdity, without betrayal and with slander. There are people in administration who have executed and rehabilitated. But in today’s government that is nothing unusual. From the recent debates on the way the Constitution is being written, we know the opinion of an individual, an official, the chosen one. With the teachers, assurance for the teachers. With the intellectuals, the argument for the intellectuals. To replace power not with spirits, but with professionals. Not with artists. But they have forgotten that a man, noble in culture, cannot be humorous. Arrogance flourishes, while ignorance, used for the purposes of persuasion, is one of the misused themes of accusations. The categories that change in this absurdity, without betrayal and with slander. There are people in administration who have executed and rehabilitated. But in today’s government that is nothing unusual. Of course, a country needs new democratic forces in order to drag along a sick administration, one that does not recognize the justice of freedoms. Fear of freedom. Fear of responsibility. Fear of free thought, of different thought. The present administration knows such fear too. Good luck to those who have not achieved it. Unfortunately, the ordinary people keep paying for it. The goal is not a case of building administration and direct communication, of national strength and the perspective of the state’s development and the freedom of ideas. The question is very simple: Which is the administration that serves the citizen, and not the state? That serves the ruler and not the law? That is the question that should be asked. And it is not asked. This question is not for those who have taken over the administration as a display of service and swagger, but for those who want free administration. They are afraid of this question. Not because they do not know the answer, but because they simply cannot bear it. (I have no further comment.)