Will everyone be pardoned?!
Nano: “I do not want political trials”
(Pages 2-3)
Reconciliation can ease duality
BY AVROR LEVONJA
Duality will once again cool the atmosphere and the political climate. Today the parliamentary group of the Socialist Party and the government will declare their position on the issue of innocence, which opens the way to minimizing the final accusations. But there are voices in government opposed to this direction. Its head, grown up in prison, whether in knowledge or in Turkey. They have no certainty at all. For a full development, the Democratic Party must condemn the senior politicians of yesterday’s government and those compromised figures who served the Hoxha regime. If the majority of the SHTR must be persuaded to “erase” all this wrongdoing, then what words does the SHTR have for ESHA-ë? The Democratic Party will be strained in the same place, taking off even the burden of a conflict over several political steps of the future. Will the system be amnestied? In principle, democracy. As a consequence of the same status and the situation that is to come, in this direction as well, where media figures are placed with a different fate for the nation, in other words…
In this case it is “clear” that punishments and requests should be made for the governing powers to wipe out yesterday’s crime, while once again receiving a moderate sentence for publishing several political steps for the future. The state system will be administered and lowered in the same process. The figures produced must create a difficult situation for the accused. For the opposition and its allies, “a sentence has been made under one guise,” “has it been made with amnesty?” In a government that another committed crime with the future? The voices are opposed. In any case, if it has been examined that the service with media involvement and the Minister of Justice, the initiative is in fact bringing government politics closer through accusation. The head of the Socialist Party parliamentary group and the government, Servon, says that it is of no consequence, considering that this was a political move to boost the Democratic Party. According to him, “removing political processes from the shadow of vengeful hatred and promoting civility is the solution.” As a result of this, the second commentary and the inclusion of the other consequences of the future…
For this argument, many political reactions are still being heard and the majority has major reservations about raising cases of its own. In cases we take and feel the near speech unbelievable. It must be clarified that these governments have been developed by the parties of the Democratic Party to strain the same place. Once the break from yesterday’s government is made, with no room for this kind of thing, while the entire state apparatus will be destroyed, seeking to judge the opposite and continue. This would make it impossible for the accused to triumph. The opposition denounces that the majority is taking it the same way. But the government announces that it will pursue the case against the higher structure of government and the arrests. In the end, withdrawing into us and protecting every appearance that is in the same idea and that its need is lacking for its interests from one person to another. This depends on the politics of the higher process. The place is being removed as much as the near would be in postponing the consequence and without proving the government has a model. If the government and the opposition decide with one mind, this would be a strong message. Pages 2-3