Day by day the Greek press continues its own speculations against the Albanian cause, making its anti-Albanian intentions ever clearer. Behind this anti-Albanian campaign stands, as always, Greek expansionism. These writings, which claim to be arguing supposedly with facts, are full of slander, fabrications, and hatred toward the Albanian nation. One of the most typical articles of this kind is the one published on 29 December 1992[?] in the Greek newspaper “Ethnos”, where the author, starting from distorted and deliberately misinterpreted facts, tries to blacken the image of Albanians and cast doubt on their historical right. The purpose of this article is clear: to prepare Greek public opinion and international public opinion for further hostile attitudes toward Albania and Albanians. In the article, political developments in our country are mentioned maliciously and inappropriate comparisons are made with dark periods of our history. The author tries to portray Albanians as a destabilizing factor in the Balkans, repeating old chauvinist theses. This propaganda is not new. It is a continuation of the anti-Albanian policy of certain Greek circles, which have never hidden their intention to interfere in Albania’s internal affairs and to hinder the consolidation of the Albanian democratic state. What makes this case more serious is the fact that some voices within the country also echo these attacks and, under the name of “socialists,” line up with Serbian policy and Greek propaganda. These positions are unacceptable and show a marked lack of national responsibility. Albania and Albanians need support, unity, and clear positions in defense of the national interest. Any attempt to legitimize anti-Albanian positions, even under the guise of political criticism, is harmful and serves only the enemies of the country. (Continued on page 4)

It is not difficult to discern the connection of certain circles in Albania with the old centers of social-communist influence in the region. The dictator’s victory in Belgrade is being used by these circles as a signal to revive their rhetoric and positions. In the daily press and in various statements, an increasingly harsh language is noticeable toward democratic processes in Albania, as well as an effort to relativize the crimes and responsibilities of the former system. These positions are not merely political polemics. They are part of a broader ideological climate that aims to soften the break with the past and create ground for the return of authoritarian mentalities. In this framework, every success of anti-democratic circles in the region is seen by them as a moral and political encouragement. Albanian society, however, has made its choice. It has entered the path of pluralism, reforms, and integration with European values. For this reason, any attempt to take advantage of negative developments abroad in order to hinder democratic transformation must be denounced firmly. (Continued on page 4)

Discussion by deputy Tritan Shehu — Instead of a constructive and responsible opposition, we have witnessed positions that in many cases align with Milosevic’s interests. This is a serious accusation, but unfortunately one that is supported by concrete statements and actions of certain opposition representatives. Albania today faces major national and democratic challenges. At this moment, every political force must show maturity, responsibility, and a high sense of nationhood. Instead, we have seen attempts to hinder reforms, to create confusion, and to damage our country’s image on the international stage. If these positions are viewed in light of developments in the former Yugoslavia and of Belgrade’s policy, the similarities become even more evident. This is not a matter of normal political debate, but of a line of conduct that objectively serves Milosevic’s propaganda. This must be said openly and without equivocation. (Continued on page 4)

Discussion by deputy Idajet Vasili — There have been attempts to diminish the successes of Albanian diplomacy and, in particular, the role of the Foreign Minister. But the facts say otherwise. In a difficult period for the country, Albanian diplomacy has managed to establish important contacts, clarify our positions, and defend national interests in international forums. The Foreign Minister has shown ability, determination, and seriousness in representing Albania. This has been acknowledged not only by our partners, but also by the concrete results of diplomatic work. Instead of recognizing this contribution, we have heard politically motivated criticism detached from reality. It is clear that their aim is not to improve the work, but to attack figures who have given clear proof of dedication to the country’s interest. For this reason, I believe the Foreign Minister has been among the most successful figures of the government in this period. (Continued on page 4)

Discussion by deputy Tomi A[?]mellit[?] — We all have the duty to defend a fair and balanced foreign policy, based on national interests and on respect for good-neighborly relations. In the troubled conditions of our region, Albania must preserve the clarity of its Western orientation and not allow any wavering from the principles that have guided the democratic process. Our foreign policy must be active, wise, and restrained, but never submissive. It must know how to defend our rights with arguments and to respond with dignity to any injustice. Such a policy is not only a guarantee for the country’s reputation, but also for internal stability and the strengthening of democratic institutions. (Continued on page 4)

We are and will be only for democratic laws — The president of the presidium of the People’s Assembly, Mr. Xhoxhi, at the head of a delegation, is visiting Albania (Continued on page 4) “Economic reform in Albania will stop the mut decline by making it stronger?”[?] — Declares the return of dictatorship — (Continued on page 4) The return of the ministers to the environment formed represent[?] — Declares the return of dictatorship — (Continued on page 4)