The boycott backfires
The European advice to the Socialist Party, delivered in Tirana by the two Council of Europe commissioners, Finsberg and Kolumberg, placed the party before the dilemma of being pro-European or anti-European.
This is the first time the Socialist Party has been institutionally invited to make a lawful decision about the future of its communications with Europe. It has also been placed under conditions for engaging with Albanian democracy in the most moderate way possible. The Council of Europe not only suggests that the Socialist Party take its seats in Parliament, but also gives its final assessment of the party’s unconstitutional position. If the Socialist MPs do not fill the empty seats in Parliament, their stance will be judged as a lack of willingness to further the aspirations of democracy in Albania—or, as the important Council of Europe commissioners put it, as a stance against democracy in Albania.
The first assessment from the Albanian left of the Socialists’ approach to Albanian politics, as viewed by the Council of Europe, came from PSD leader Gjinushi, who did not hesitate to call Europe late in its obsessions. Gjinushi made this joke after making hundreds and hundreds of statements about a modern, democratic Europe that wants democracy in Albania and not dictatorship, and so on, and so forth. Gjinushi’s social-democratic ideal goes no further than his fight against the Democratic Party. Without that fight, the political activity of not only Gjinushi but also Ceka and the entire far left—which has functioned until now as an alternative to reform in Albania—would grind to a halt and become nonexistent. Thus, his reproach to Europe for being late is also part of his fight against the Democratic Party and its obsessions, which permanently align with those of democratic Europe.
Regardless of the positions taken by small left-wing political groups or Socialist leaders, an additional factor has now entered Albanian politics and enriched it: the Council of Europe’s request that Parliament also be filled by nine more Socialist MPs. Until now, the Socialists had portrayed their absence from Parliament as consistent with European positions concerning objections to the 26 May elections. That component of Socialist—or indeed broader left-wing—propaganda has now been completely burned away. The fact that this discussion was initiated not only by the one-sided suggestions of the DP but also by Europe shifts the right entirely to the right. More or less, this suggestion also brings down the curtain on a much-discussed chapter: the 26 May elections. For the Socialists, this is an opportunity to reap the benefits of their campaign as quickly as possible; for the Democrats, it is a European endorsement of their suggestions, which have always fallen within the green spectrum of the West. Meanwhile, the boycott method is devalued as a political tool deliberately adopted as an alternative by certain Albanian political parties, and politicians in general return to moderate methods, such as discussions in Parliament or ordinary round-table talks.
Retraction
In an article published on 29.08.1996, the Qendra newspaper “Poli” made a low and entirely false allegation about the IRI Conference, citing me personally as having made several completely unfounded statements, which I categorically reject. Although it is in keeping with this newspaper’s nature to slander, I express my deepest indignation that the extreme-left press continues to display such a primitive trait as lying. I also believe that a party can win elections not because it chairs the election commissions, but because it enjoys the broad and unreserved support of a large electorate—an electorate politically oriented toward the center, with national aspirations, something Poli i Qendrës entirely lacks.
MIRUSH MALI
Finsberg: If the opposition does not take its seats in Parliament, it denies democracy
If the Socialists do not go to Parliament, they are against democracy. This was Europe’s assessment of the Socialists’ attitude toward Albania’s democratic institutions and, likewise, of their slanderous attempt to come to power through machinations. This was made clear yesterday in a statement to the press by Lord Finsberg.
During their stay in Albania, the two Council of Europe commissioners clarified Europe’s assessment of Albanian politics and of the soundness of the Democratic Party’s political actions. The DP’s assessment—that the SP’s participation in Parliament would be an action most beneficial to the SP itself—is fully consistent with Europe’s assessment of this issue. The Socialists must now choose between their congress and Europe. If the former offers them left-wing demagoguery, according to which victory must always be revolutionary, Europe offers them modern methods of political action. Naturally, it is not so easy for the Socialists to choose between the boycott and the logic of the West.
Assessing the role of the opposition in a democracy and referring to the Albanian opposition’s refusal to participate in Parliament, Lord Finsberg stressed in his statement that the opposition has a duty to oppose the government from within the parliament to which it was elected, no matter how much it disputes the result. If they do not take their seats, they are in fact denying democracy.
In his statement, the senior European parliamentarian also addressed the majority, which bears a great responsibility to conduct itself in such a way as to ensure that the opposition is treated properly.
His press statement goes on to say that the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has called for a round table so that Albania’s political parties can discuss all their problems, including the Constitution and the electoral mechanisms, he emphasized in the statement.
Lord Finsberg concludes that if this round table cannot be convened, those responsible for this act will carry a heavy burden.