Outdated practices
It sounds like an anecdote, something that recently happened at the «Enver» plant, but unfortunately it is not. The place of the anecdote is taken by a thought. One hears everywhere and nowhere that if our economy really is in a difficult situation, because of the shortage of foreign currency and raw materials, then the solution to everything is in our hands. What are these? Some call them internal forces, others reserves, others initiative, and in the end it does not matter what they are called. What matters is that instead of often using them and putting them into circulation, we lock them in a safe, padlock them and do not let them breathe. The task is how to free them from the rust of administration and obsolescence.
At the «Enver» plant it had been decided to move a new lathe to a workshop. During transport, it was noticed that the place where it was to be installed had not yet been prepared. The lathe remained in the yard. Days and weeks passed. Someone said a project had to be made; another said the management had to approve it; a third said a commission was needed to see whether the place was suitable. Meanwhile, the machine stood covered with tarpaulins, as a living proof of what we call an outdated practice. No one bore responsibility, but everyone had a reason.
Here the issue is not just one machine. It is about a way of working. About a psychology that fears decisions, that waits for the order and the paperwork, that gets tangled in its own links and loses time, energy and resources. Under new conditions, when the economy demands faster action, more rational organization, saving every hour of work and every material, we cannot go on with the same templates.
There are enterprises where it is still believed that initiative must come only from above. There are managers who prefer not to move without being covered in papers. There are specialists who know the solution but do not say it, because «we do not want trouble». And so a simple task drags on, a small problem is inflated, and a procedure that could easily be shortened becomes an obstacle. Meanwhile production waits, the plan waits, the collective waits.
We must understand that initiatives are not born in frozen ground. They require trust, competence, responsibility and a new spirit in work relations. Every manager must know how to distinguish between necessary order and pointless bureaucracy. Every link in the chain must account for the delays it causes. Every specialist must feel obliged to propose the best path and not hide behind habit.
Today more than ever, we do not need pretty words about internal reserves, but concrete opening of the paths that turn them into production. It is not enough to repeat that we have possibilities; we must use them with courage and wisdom. Outdated practices do not disappear by themselves. They must be struck down in every office, in every workshop, in every mindset. Only then does the word about change gain real substance.