THE BUSINESS OF TRIALS
The peaceful executions of today to govern the country and pave the way for big economic business are favoring the business of political trials in order to eliminate their opponents
service traces of real corruption oversight cover-
up their complete injustice and wish
TODAY’S PHENOMENON:
THE BUSINESS OF TRIALS
The peaceful executioners of today, in order to govern the country and open the way for big economic business, are favoring the business of political trials to eliminate their opponents through violence, terror, prisons; in this way they seek to hide the traces of real corruption, the misinformation of the country, they are obscuring their total injustice
Could it really be some kind of pedantry, always experienced as a means of never stopping at difficult success? What is called the power of the court, the undercurrents of unheard-of orders in closed rooms? These are the questions that arise again every time society sees, tired of abuse, that justice is being replaced by political pressure. Instead of the court being an independent institution, it is being used as an instrument to frighten, compromise, and remove opponents.
In this charged climate, where a fabricated accusation is enough to tarnish anyone’s reputation, the question arises: who benefits? The power of the day benefits, which in the name of the law seeks to administer fear. Big business also benefits, finding calm ground when politics clears the path of those who raise their voices. In this way, trials are turned into a market: a market of influence, bargaining, and public spectacle.
It is no coincidence that, together with the noise of the proceedings, the silence over the major affairs grows. The more we speak about people declared guilty before their time, the less the real wrongs are investigated. Thus, big corruption remains in the dark, while the spotlight falls on names selected for political consumption. Even when the accusations do not hold, the damage is done: the individual is branded, public opinion is steered, and another dose of uncertainty is cast over the public climate.
The problem is deep, because it is linked to the deformation of the state itself. When justice serves politics, the law loses its moral authority. When the media is fed with orchestrated proceedings, the citizen begins to trust nothing. And when the opposition or critical voices are treated as enemies to be neutralized, democracy remains only a beautiful word in statements.
This is why political trials should not be seen as a usual episode of transition. They are a symptom of a more serious disease: the thirst for limitless power and the silent alliance between fear-based politics and economic interest. Until this alliance is broken, the country will swing between sensational court scenes and deep silence over the most real injustices.
In the end, the question is not only who is sentenced today, but what kind of society is being built tomorrow. If the court remains a tribunal of political spectacle, then the greatest loser will be the citizen. And if the law turns into a shield for the strong against the unprotected, then the business of trials will continue to flourish precisely where justice should rule.
ALBANIAN TANKHENËNTOPOLI: THE POKER TABLE IS TURNED OVER, THE GAME STARTS FROM SCRATCH
The possible scenario of political changes seems set to push the actors once again into new positions. Yesterday’s agreements appear temporary, while tomorrow’s calculations are being made at a pace that does not allow one to believe in anything stable. At this table where everyone plays for the last card, alliances appear and break apart quickly.
Seen from the outside, the game looks like a long poker match in which no one reveals their true hand. But whenever someone thinks they have won, the table is overturned and everything starts from scratch. This happens because interests are not programmed by principles, but by the need for political survival. In such terrain, programs fade and only combinations remain.
After the latest moves, the main question is whether the country will gain stability or sink further into uncertainty. Instead of a long-term vision, day-to-day reactions are dominating. This produces not only political confusion, but also social fatigue. Citizens follow a scene in which promises are recycled, figures change places, and big words lose weight.
If the game really starts from scratch, then the challenge remains the same: will a responsible political culture be built, or will the table remain forever the place where the one who knows how to topple the rules before the match ends comes out on top?
Why was the policeman Qirje Rusimi killed?
A few days ago, a serious incident shocked public opinion. The killing of police officer Qirje Rusimi was widely commented on and raised many questions about the circumstances, motives, and responsibilities. At the heart of the debate is the question of whether this was an ordinary criminal act or an episode linked to the deeper tensions of the time.
According to various sources, the victim had been on duty when the attack took place. The exact circumstances remain unclear, but the fact that the target was a representative of law and order makes the event even more serious. There are voices speaking of revenge, others of a conflict fueled by the turbulent environment of the time, while some suspicions go as far as the possibility of an act with a political background.
In a period when trust in institutions is wavering, the killing of a policeman strikes not only the family and the police force, but also the very sense of public safety. Therefore, investigating this event is not merely a legal necessity, but also a test for the state: whether it is capable of uncovering the truth, punishing the guilty, and avoiding political manipulation of such an event.
Public opinion awaits answers. Who killed Qirje Rusimi, why did this happen, and who benefits from the darkness that still covers the case? Until these questions receive credible answers, the murder will remain not only a serious crime, but also an alarm bell for society.
THE POLICE STATE PUNISHES POLICEMEN
It drags more than 40 officers and more than 100 policemen into the streets
According to sources confirmed from various districts, a wave of administrative and disciplinary measures has struck the law-and-order structures. More than 40 officers and more than 100 policemen have been removed, suspended, or transferred in circumstances that have sparked intense public debate. The decisions are presented as reorganization measures, but many of those affected see them as political punishment.
At the center of the criticism is the way these measures are being implemented. Without sufficient transparency, without convincing explanations, and in a climate of tension, the purges look more like a show of force than a genuine reform. This has caused dissatisfaction not only among police employees, but also among the public, which views with concern the destabilization of a sector vital to security.
When the state punishes its own policemen in this way, the question arises whether the aim is to strengthen order or to subject the apparatus to political will. A frightened police force, uncertain about its job and exposed to pressure, can hardly guarantee public order with professionalism. On the contrary, it becomes more sensitive to political command and weaker in the face of the law.
This is why the event is being read as more than a personnel issue. It is seen as an indicator of a governance model that views the state apparatus not as a public service, but as a tool of obedience and control. And if this model deepens, the consequences will not be paid only by the dismissed policemen, but by society as a whole.
Shahaku for “Zërin e Popullit”
In a statement given to the newspaper, Shahaku comments on the latest political developments and the positions being taken toward the opposition. According to him, the climate that has been created is weighing on public life and is pushing the debate away from the real concerns of citizens. He underlines that polarization, institutional pressure, and the lack of dialogue are creating an unsafe atmosphere.
In his interview, Shahaku stresses that the country needs calm, democratic guarantees, and a return of trust in institutions. He criticizes exclusionary language and the use of state mechanisms for political purposes, calling for competition to take place on equal ground.
His statement comes at a tense time and is seen as part of a broader debate over the country’s direction. For “Zëri i Popullit,” he expresses concern that today’s conflictual atmosphere could have long-term consequences for democracy and social life.
GENERAL SLAUGHTER
At the center of the spiral of Tirana.
Tirana.
GENERAL SLAUGHTER
REPLY
THANK YOU, MR. MEKSI
(Continues on page 8)
(Continues on page 2)
(Continues on page 3)
