THE FOUNDATIONS OF A SECURE FUTURE REQUIRE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL POLITICAL FORCES AND BROAD SOCIAL SUPPORT
Press conference of the Socialist Party
THE FOUNDATIONS OF A SECURE FUTURE
REQUIRE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL POLITICAL FORCES
AND BROAD SOCIAL SUPPORT
- True democracy requires respect for fundamental human rights and freedoms, and it requires that opposition forces be given the necessary space to act -
Yesterday at 10 o'clock, the Deputy Secretary of the Socialist Party, Dr. Servet Pëllumbi, and the chairman of the parliamentary group Namik Dokle held a press conference at the headquarters of the Socialist Party concerning the political situation and the state of human rights in the country. Journalists from the domestic and foreign press as well as representatives of the diplomatic corps accredited in Tirana took part.
At the beginning Dr. Servet Pëllumbi read the statement on the political situation and the state of human rights in Albania. Then Servet Pëllumbi and Namik Dokle answered journalists' questions.
Mr. Dokle, you have been accused of having spoken against Albania's admission to the Council of Europe. What is your position regarding these accusations?
A very great fuss has been made about the claim that Namik Dokle is blocking Albania's admission to the Council of Europe. It is absolutely impossible for Namik Dokle to hinder such events, just as it was impossible for Albania to enter the Council of Europe even 20-30 years later. Albania's entry into the Council of Europe was a joint effort of all sides, of all political parties in Albania, and of Albania's own social, economic, and political life. It is unfortunate that Albania has been waiting longer than any other state at the doors of Europe. As is known, Albania's request to be admitted to the Council of Europe was submitted on 4 May 1992, and on the agenda of the nearest meeting of the Council of Europe, the Parliamentary Assembly, to be held in January of this year, Albania's admission has still not been determined, as it is being said that Slovenia was admitted after 17 months, Romania after 20 months, Hungary after 11 months, Bulgaria after 19 months; for Albania, they say, it would take 2 years to be admitted to the Council of Europe [?]. There is an explanation for this. On 4 May, when Albania's request was submitted to the Council of Europe, the Parliamentary Assembly, it was submitted by the government and was made by all the deputies of the Assembly. But the question was clearer. One of the questions asked to Mr. Berisha was this: “How will you build Albania in the post-communist situation?” The question came from a Spaniard, and Mr. Berisha replied: “We will take Spain as our model,” and this was welcomed by the whole Assembly. But the Albanian reality has truths in which Albania has not dealt much with the past, but, on the contrary, with the suppression of human rights. The rights of the opposition have been restricted, press freedom has been limited, and above all, Albania still does not have a Constitution that guarantees all the mechanisms, both the independence of the powers, especially the judiciary, and other political rights and human rights.
Is there a Zhirinovsky in Albania?
I think there is not, and there cannot be, a Zhirinovsky in Albania, because Albania is so small and so weak that it cannot threaten, and can instead be threatened, by neither the United States of America nor Europe. Therefore, there will never be a Zhirinovsky.
There are rumors about talks between the Socialist Party delegation and the President of the Republic during yesterday's meeting on issues that were not published in the press. What is your opinion on these rumors?
Regarding the meeting a few days ago with President Berisha, I would say that, although no concrete result was achieved, our message was clear, essentially the same message as today's statement: the need for understanding, the need to ease tensions in the country. That was the concern. It was difficult to produce concrete results from one conversation and one meeting when we came to specific issues, but nevertheless I think it was achieved and understood that we should stop where we are and discuss with the president, as a matter of building something. And I would very much like, in such a dialogue regardless of the outcome, to have a lively debate in which questions are asked and answered about everything, whether to make the country better or in the interest of the political forces. We also talked about the fight against corruption, the process of economic reform, and avoiding all those negative phenomena.
DECLARATION
of the Socialist Party of Albania
to the press
We are beginning 1994 not completely without events or hopes, but still in an atmosphere of increasing political tensions that threaten democracy, political stability, the normal economy of the transition toward a market economy, foreign investment, and Albania's integration into Europe.
It is true that the current tense political climate has long been fueled by such an objective rhetoric, which gives equal weight to all political forces in the country, as well as accusations of this style, perhaps new but senseless; as a commander, the difficulty of dissident integration, one-sided communication with the outside, lack of a tradition and culture of pluralist democracy [?].
But it is regrettable that there are other subjective factors that are putting at risk the objective core of political and social tensions. We are talking about serious disturbances of democratic logic and practice.
The phase is dragging on in which parties mainly fight to secure “keyless” votes and political self-respect, which seriously hinders the creation of space for tolerance and understanding so that parties can sit at the table and jointly resolve the country's fate and the reforms, which we consider inevitable.
The party in power is interested in the fixed idea of an “absolute delegitimization,” and therefore takes care to dominate rather than govern, to remove every real opposition, not even sparing the most moderate formalist parties in coalition. This logic has brought it to positions of intolerance toward diversity within itself and to harsh blows against the opposition or political opponents. Such an anti-democratic mentality, with euphoria as its complement, the magnification of charismatic magic, and the erasing of failures, has led to mass disappointment and the polarization of society, not only at the top but also below, among the electorate. In reality, a group is being pushed onto a speculative road, supported by the state and party mechanism; on the other hand, the national wealth created is becoming the prey of all, and is being dealt with through incitement, for a solution with a specific political group; unemployment is rising, poverty is growing, there is a lack of support from reform, peace is being achieved, and a road full of social-psychological shocks has been taken for part of society and government.
On the institutional level, today we are living in a situation characterized by the effort to have strong parties and weak democratic institutions. The country remains without a Constitution. Local government is blocked by adminis-
(Continues on page 2)
Regarding these days when early elections in Albania are being discussed, it is thought that they also have the support of the main political forces in Albania.
In our statement, and also in the positions we have taken so far, we have argued the need for early elections as the only constitutional means for a new political solution that the country needs, as reflected in the relationships that exist in parliament and in power, to fulfill all these new relations that have been created in the electorate. So it is also a response to the electorate's demands to change these relations in the state institutions as well. Of course, we cannot impose it with the number of deputies we have in parliament, nor do we seek to impose the idea of early elections. We present our arguments, we present our political alternative, which would correspond to the current reality and the needs posed by Albanian democracy. Of course, this is also a message to the other political forces, which, as far as we know, as we have followed them and from the opinion they have expressed in their press, have been
(Continues on page 2)