Exile, a new triumph of primitive anti-communism! The same shameless and banal anti-communism that, in the name of “democracy,” made a mockery of civilized Europe with the countless politico-zoological exotica of this country. In a place that also has the highest levels of parliamentary democracy, such prejudiced voices were nonetheless thrown out without appeal against “an organized pressure by the Albanian government on the population of the town of the Greek minority” and other such sophistries. And probably that was enough for some deputies of the European Parliament to consider almost all “violations of human rights” in Albania a settled matter. Mr. Xhuzepe [...] and a group of right-wing Italian parliamentarians, conservative Englishmen and far-right deputies, with an openly anti-communist stance, prepared and submitted a resolution whose content clearly implied that it aimed to condemn Albania. From the very beginning of the proceedings of the European Parliament, in a harsh tone and forced political language, expressions such as: “Albania is sliding into dictatorship,” “human rights are being seriously violated in Albania,” “the Greek minority is being persecuted,” etc., were used. The debate was preceded by such a prejudiced spirit. The interventions of some of the deputies were completely one-sided, based on dubious materials and information, coming from circles that do not hide their political goals against the Albanian state. It became clear that emotions in the chamber and old stereotypes about Albania were being played on. Instead of a measured and objective analysis, political sensationalism was preferred. So much so that they did not hesitate to speak in the name of “defending democracy,” attacking Albanian institutions and issuing verdicts without waiting for any serious verification of the facts. Very little was said about the internal political climate, about the organized provocations, about the use of the minority issue as a means of pressure on Tirana. No one dwelled for long on the responsibility of those who artificially internationalize a delicate issue. The proposed resolution was full of harsh formulations and clearly punitive language. It sought to place in the dock not a government or a specific action, but the Albanian state itself and its dignity. That is why our reaction against this prejudiced climate is not only understandable, but necessary. Today, more than ever, Albania needs an honest relationship with Europe, not hasty political trials. No country can be treated like a permanent school pupil, given grades without hearing its own defense. Albania asks for understanding, not symbolic punishments; dialogue, not labels. (Parts unreadable in the lower columns of the article)[?]

After a reasonable silence regarding Prime Minister Meksi’s statements about the so-called “dinghy issue,” absurd declarations that unfortunately found their way into the Italian and Greek press, I had the chance to see up close the arrogance of certain circles in Athens that keep flogging the same dead horse. This climate was further fueled by recent developments and by hasty political reactions. In these circumstances, the question arises: where is Albania heading and what is being sought with this kind of multiple pressure? Is the ground being prepared for completely unforeseen developments? There is no shortage of signs that some external and internal factors are playing with fire. A. [...] (Other unreadable parts)[?]

FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS [...] the state legal service, the Prosecutor’s Office, investigative bodies and other responsible structures have acted in violation of constitutional norms and fundamental human rights. In this context, the case of Faios Nanos stands as a symbol of a political pursuit that runs counter to democratic standards. Procedural violations have been committed repeatedly, defense requests have been ignored, psychological pressure has been exerted, and an unacceptable denigrating climate has been created. All this, according to the author’s assessment, can be interpreted only as a deliberate and unlawful interference. This also raises the question of institutional responsibility and the need for a full reassessment of the process. Otherwise, not only the fate of the individuals concerned is at risk, but also public trust in justice itself. (The original text in the relevant columns is partly unreadable)[?]

WE EMPHASIZE: [...] and that it is part of a broader political debate. Objections have been raised regarding the way it was organized and the propagandistic tone given to it by the organizers and by some media outlets. The author stresses that the distortion of facts and the use of national issues for narrow political gain must not be allowed. (To be continued on page 5)

The city police [...] has pointed out that the many problems, the lack of guidance and incompetence in management have brought serious consequences to public order and everyday life. The author asks whether subordinates are being unfairly blamed, while the real responsibility belongs to the leaders who fail to organize the work and maintain the necessary control. (To be continued on page 4)

DVL 4 days with 20 February, in sa[?] ... a commemorative meeting dedicated to the People’s Hero Tuk Jakova was held. The meeting was attended by family members, veterans and representatives of social organizations. His life and work were discussed, as well as his contribution to the war and the role he played in important periods of our history. (Partially unreadable)[?]

“Observations from Gjirokastra” Damage and lack of care have been noted in museum and historical objects, which represent a valuable asset for the city and for national culture. The material raises concern about their condition, the lack of funds, and the need for intervention by the responsible institutions for restoration and preservation. (To be continued on page 4)