The truth, as it is true, about the "Nano affair". THE TRUTH, AS IT IS TRUE, ABOUT THE "NANO AFFAIR" WHEN AND HOW DID LEVANTE-CO ARRIVE IN ALBANIA? (STATEMENTS AND TESTIMONIES) Fatos Nano took office as prime minister on 22. 2. 1991, Levante-CO had arrived before 22. 1. 1991 Fatos Nano did not appoint it, he found Levante-Co already appointed The "Nano" government, in decision No. 91 dated 12.03.1991, excludes "Iliria Holding" from aid expenditures FROM THE REPORT SENT TO THE PARLIAMENT IN APRIL 1993 The Miloziola of the "aid that arrived" THE FIRST BOOMERANG "My enemy's friend is my enemy" (Continued on page 4)

Yesterday, the head of the delegation of the European Parliamentary Standing Committee on relations with the European Parliament, Mr. Skënder Gjinushi, together with the chargé d'affaires of the Embassy of Albania in Belgium, Mr. Ali Spahia, were received at the headquarters of the European Community Commission in Brussels by the director for relations with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, Mr. Frans Claes. Mr. Gjinushi informed Mr. Claes about the progress of reforms in our country, while Mr. Claes expressed the readiness of the structures of the European Community Commission to assist in areas of mutual interest. Voices - concerns and full information

(Follow-up) I have long waited to address this issue. All the claims of SPAK (?) are fables. The State Prosecution apparently communicated to Mr. Nano, with the act of completion, and his lawyers apparently requested that copies of all the investigation documents be made available to them. In our view, this confirms that the document can have no value whatsoever for the public judicial process, because even if these copies are made available daily under the influence of public opinion, the court is obliged to base itself on how accurate and complete the proceedings against Mr. Nano turn out to be. As it seems even today, the culture of administering justice is far from the rule-of-law state. No one has the right to make the proceedings public while they have not yet been examined in court. In this respect, even those who have made statements, including in defense of the accused, have used a practice that runs counter to the notion of judicial independence. Finally, the issue being discussed has led to no small amount of political misunderstanding. Instead of being treated as a matter of justice, it has been turned into a propaganda issue, where everyone is trying to draw their own advantage. It seems to me that even if the arrest measure remains in force, this cannot replace a fair and transparent trial. Public opinion must wait for the court's decision and not be fed with stories and insinuations. (Continued on page 4)

Thirdly, the afternoon in England followed with close attention the parliamentary debate sessions on the resolutions. After the first discussions, it became clear that the opposition parties were trying to use the opportunity to strike at the majority, while the latter insisted that it was pursuing a line of necessary reforms. After recent developments, a large part of public opinion has remained unclear about some of the accusations and counteraccusations that have been circulated. Instead of facts, political assessments are dominating, and this is harming the climate of debate. Within this framework, the problem is not only a proper name, but the way the state functions and the guarantees it gives citizens for a proper legal process. (Continued on page 4)

Instead of clarification about what they speculate In the explanation below, the editorial office states that in recent days various interpretations have been made regarding a statement by MP Luan Hadaraga. To avoid misunderstandings, the full text of his statement is published. According to Mr. Hadaraga, the issue of political persecuted people cannot be treated only as a political card. It requires a human, legal, and institutional approach, taking into account the consequences of the former regime and the need for social integration. He emphasizes that moral and material compensation is essential, but it must be feasible and supported by the state's real possibilities. (Continued on page 4)

FROM THE REPORT SENT TO THE PARLIAMENT IN APRIL 1993 The Miloziola of "aid that arrived" THE FIRST BOOMERANG "The friend of my enemy is my enemy" (Continued on page 4) FROM THE TERM OF DEPUTY PROSECUTOR F. Dervishi READ BY DISTRICT PROSECUTOR A. Qeleshi Fatos Nano is accused of having brought LEVANTE CO... (Continued on page 4) FAUND HOKHA: THE TRUTH FOR THE DOCUMENTS OF MEMORY (From the TV program of 3 March 1993) BIJADIN SHELIA (Sentenced in August 1990) (Continued on page 4) FROM THE DEFENSE OF SONATI PLAKES IN GIRO I did not work in the office of Mr. Fatos Nano, but I worked with him... (Continued on page 4)