THE PS COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF TIRANA
WHICH WOULD TRY TO REMOVE PARLIAMENTARISM FROM THE APPROVAL OF THE CONSTITUTION, WOULD INEVITABLY LEAD TO EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS
WHICH WOULD TRY TO REMOVE
PARLIAMENTARISM FROM THE APPROVAL OF THE CONSTITUTION,
WOULD INEVITABLY LEAD TO EARLY
PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS
- By placing the constitution’s approval first, the opposition is giving the Democratic Party a new chance.
- Berisha understands politics not as the art of the possible, but as a means to rule.
- The “No” vote in the referendum was also a protest against the PD’s partisan games against Albanians at home and abroad.
From the speech of Dr. Servet Pëllumbi
At the beginning of his speech, Dr. Servet Pëllumbi greeted those attending the meeting and then focused on the PS’s results after the campaign against the constitutional draft in the 6 November referendum. He stressed that the PS had had one of the most successful campaigns it had ever carried out and the fact that it received over 840,000 votes in support of its opposition overturns Sali Berisha’s lie that it represented a minority. This, he said, means that in Albania the time has come for those in power to understand that even when you lose, you must leave, you must resign. The content of the constitutional draft that the people voted on on 6 November was, according to him, completely different from what the referendum question summarized, a question full of euphemisms and ambiguity. The People’s Assembly put only one question to the people for approval. The way the campaign was conducted prevented the people from judging the draft as a whole. The vote, the speaker pointed out, was not only a vote against the constitutional draft, but above all a vote against the method and style of governance of the ruling party. “Yes” or “No” to the constitution, “Yes” or “No” to Berisha? That was the issue that was raised. This referendum was understood by the people as a trial of the two years of democratic rule. The people delivered the deserved punishment to this regime. The speaker further argued that the 6 November referendum was contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Albania, because the temporary constitution explicitly states that before the draft is submitted to a referendum, it must be given to the deputies. This was not done. On the contrary, the draft was given to the deputies only one week before the referendum. This was more than a formal violation. It was an act that bypassed Parliament, depriving it of the right to discuss, amend, approve or reject the draft. By placing the approval of the constitution first, the opposition and the PS are giving the Democratic Party a second chance. “The constitution,” he said, “we do not oppose for the sake of the constitution itself, but we oppose it because of the way the government acted and because of its content. There is no good constitution without free citizens, without a rule-of-law state and without parliamentary oversight.” Dr. Pëllumbi said that the referendum was also a test of the political maturity of Albanians. Albanian citizens understood that one cannot vote blindly for what power presents as national salvation. They gave a political answer to the arrogance of power. He then turned to the need to reorganize the PS in the capital, emphasizing strengthening ties with the electorate, increasing the role of the forums, and active, civic opposition. According to him, Berisha’s government understands politics not as the art of the possible, but as a means to rule. This way of thinking keeps the country in constant tension and weakens the state. Only a strong, parliamentary and civic opposition can curb this tendency.
(continued on page 3)