WHY ARE YOU SHOOTING AT MAJKO?
A "calm governance" absurdity is emerging, but the clans must reach an understanding
An absurdity is emerging: "calm governance," but the clans must reach an understanding! Up to today in the PS no one has been blocked from getting a post or assignment, except the one who came out challenging and blackmailing everyone. Starting from these obvious difficulties, each person tries to leave as many things as possible in their own hands, while avoiding responsibilities. There is even a theory that the more extraordinary people you have around you and the more predisposed they are to act and think independently, the more capable the leader appears. Yet that is only one side of the problem. But there are both sides. A calm, unbiased and prejudice-free view would help keep away arrogance and soften the noise. Let one love, let one fight with passion. Let one persuade, but with wisdom. Let us not rush to say the last word just for the sake of saying it. Time gives its own verdict, and if there are and if there are needed people who never back away from the duel of ideas. I understand, without wanting to exaggerate, that the name of the Government called "calm governance" will be associated first of all with that, turning it into a label rather than a characteristic. If the opposition does not accept it, it should accept that the PS cannot be divided into clans, while governance needs collegiality. The people and the government must be on the same side, and not create the impression that the ministers are fighting one another. For Sunday, although it is a sensitive issue, you seem to have blamed several Wednesday matters because of a sparse statement, but everything remains clear that the official definitions will have an impact. We continue to need moderation. Neither unnecessary noise nor slander is useful. This was an intervention, however clear, in this imperfect situation. There are as many injustices as there are rights. The true word must remain where it belongs. We do not believe in invented models or in chairmen who stand above the parties. Rules are needed for everyone, and they must be unquestionable. If another spirit is sown among the people, under the motto of boundless competition and moral labeling, the defeat would be both swift and undeserved. (More on pages 4-5)